Subscriber Engagement and Your Inbox Placement Rates

July 25, 2017

Posted by ljmcnitt. Published in Tips and Tactics

Julia Peavy is currently the Director of Partner Services at Return Path, the leader in email deliverability. In this role, Julia is responsible for working Return Path’s largest partners to improve the client experience through consistent, quality, and scalable services. Prior to this, Julia held various consulting and management roles at Return Path and managed the flagship email newsletter and online demand generation campaigns at Sun Microsystems. When Julia's not helping clients and partners, you can find her on the slopes, looking for bargains, or watching one of her boys' many sporting events. Julia holds a M.A. from the University of Denver and currently resides in Louisville.

This post originally appeared on the Return Path blog.

Have an email database filled with subscribers that aren’t opening or clicking? Or a database full of email addresses that aren’t active with their inbox? You’re likely suffering from Inbox Placement issues.

For some time now, we’ve known that Mailbox Providers are looking at subscriber engagement to help determine where to filter a brand’s email. Not surprisingly, we work with a lot of clients to help them understand how a lack of email engagement can affect their inbox placement. Yet, many senders still don’t understand the link between subscriber engagement and inbox placement – until it’s too late.

To demonstrate the relationship between engagement and inbox placement, I analyzed the reactivation campaigns from some large marketers. To do this analysis, I identified several reactivation (also commonly referred to as “win-back” or “reengagement”) campaigns based on subject line keywords and content analysis using Return Path’s Inbox Insight product.

After I was able to identify campaigns that were targeting inactive email subscribers, I looked at the metrics for these individual campaigns vs. the overall metrics for the month the campaign was deployed. Please note, that while subject lines and content can help determine which emails are likely sent to subscribers that haven’t engaged with a brand’s email program for an extended period of time, the “inactive” period for each brand is unique. In addition, the quality of the subscribers on the file, the age of the email list, the vertical, the perception of the  brand by subscribers, the amount of emails regularly received by the subscribers from the brand as well as other brands, and the source of the email address all play a role is these engagement metrics. However, it is pretty clear that no matter the brand, sending to inactive email subscribers affects inbox placement rates.

Let’s start with the obvious. Some brands have better overall engagement than other brands. We can see that in figure 1. Brand A’s average monthly read rate is above 25% for each month evaluated. Brand G, on the other hand, has an overall read rate of 17%. But, what is also obvious for all brands (except for one campaign for Brand F), the reengagement campaigns have a read rate well below the overall monthly read rate for these senders. In general, these campaigns have a read rate below 10% with many campaigns having read rates below 5%. Given that the audiences for these campaigns have been disengaged with the brand’s email program for an extended period of time, this is not surprising.

read_rate_w640

Figure 1 

Now let’s look at the ISP-marked spam rates for these reactivation campaigns compared to the monthly ISP-marked spam rates for these brands. In Figure 2 below, we can see that generally, these big brands have very respectable ISP-marked spam rates. However, for campaigns that target inactive subscribers, the ISP-marked spam rate is often 3-5 times higher than the average monthly rate. Having the emails delivered to the spam folder is likely another contributing factor to the lower read rates we see above.  Interestingly, Brand B had a very high read rate for their reengagement campaign, but also had one of the higher ISP-marked spam rates for their reengagement campaign. While Brand C had low ISP-marked spam rates overall and for their reactivation campaigns, Brands D and G had high ISP-marked spam rates for all of their win-back campaigns.

isp_marked_spam_w640

Figure 2

In the end, who you have in your email database matters. If you are sending campaigns (reactivation or normal broadcast campaigns) to inactive subscribers, your inbox placement can suffer. And in the end, this hurts your bottom line. In order to mitigate your risk, we recommend creating a throttling schedule to test what works for your brand and to carefully monitor your placement and sender reputation metrics throughout the process. By understanding what you are sending to whom, you can better manage your email program overall and continue to reap the benefits of this profitable channel.

Learn more about email marketing and managing your subscriber list at our upcoming Evening Brew with Julia Peavy, It's Not Me, It's You: Breaking Up With Your Email Subscriber List, on July 27.

Leave a comment

loading

Read These Other July 2017 Articles

SEARCH